ABSTRACT:
Languages originated as a result of man
referring to the objects with sounds corresponding to the feelings he
get when
considering those objects and/or imitating the sounds of objects they
are
related with, to refer to those objects. The commonality in languages of
different regions is due to the feelings of all the human races being
the same,
because of common genes.
KEY
WORDS: Language,
Man, English, Sanskrit
EXPLANATION:
We
can see many
words with similarity for referring to the same object in different
languages
of different geographic regions on the Earth. For example the object
referred
as ‘mother’ has similar words in most of the languages through out
the world like ‘ma’, ‘mata’, ‘amma’,
‘matru’, in Indian languages; ‘mummy’,
‘mom’, etc in Europe and ‘mu’, ‘moh’ etc.
in china and Korea.
When
a man feels
love, his brain makes his sense organs to act in a light way. ‘ma’
is the basic form of the sound a man can speak with least effort by
tongue and
mouth. So, the sound ‘ma’ is the one a man gets out of his mouth
when he feels light at objects he love, to refer to those objects, even
if he
was not taught any language. Because only mother takes care of children
to a
large extent and children feel light at their mother and have tendency
to speak
this word out of their mouth to refer to her. This gave birth to the
word
meaning ‘mother’ in different languages with same ‘m’
in many of them, independently. And the similar basic sound ‘pa’
or’ ba’, which is not so easy to speak as to speak
‘ma’, but easier compared to speaking of other sounds gave raise to
words like ‘father’, ‘papa’, ‘pitru’ ,
‘baba’, ‘babu’ for meaning ‘father’.
When
people feel
stress in some sense (in seen, sound, touch, smell, taste), their brain
drives
them to use force in every action, either it is speaking about that
sense or
representing that by doing some action. Corresponding sounds were made
by human
beings to refer to those objects, which gradually gave rise to
corresponding words.
So, words referring stress are spoken with stress. That is why, all the
words referring strength or power or stress are like
‘brittle’, ‘glitter’, ‘bitter’ with
stressed ‘t’ in English and ‘katte’,
‘gatti’ meaning ‘brittle’ in Telugu. Similarly, words
referring smoothness are like ‘pity’, ‘kind’,
‘slender’ etc., which do not contain any stress in their sounding.
Generally, words spoken in anger are short and may be stressed like
‘kick’, ‘hit’. Words spoken in love are easy to speak
and may be longer. Thus, some words are feelings dependent. So, objects
with
different qualities giving rise to different feelings in human beings
(Our
feelings are influenced by the color, brightness, shape, sound, smell
and
taste, etc of objects) when human-beings consider or feel them are
referred
with different correspondingly accentuating and/or pronunciating words.
But,
Accentuation is dominant over pronunciation. That is why; some words
referring
to similar objects in different languages have similar accentuation and
may or
may not have similar pronunciation. There may be exceptions, but many of
the
words follow the feelings in brain while referring to the objects. This
is the
way languages got some of their words. Some other words got birth as
humans
referred objects with the sounds they are related with. For example,
crow is
named as this as it makes a sound like ‘craw’.
A
group of
regional languages could have got inheritance from some mother language
of that
region or corresponding human race. But, languages over the vast globe
got
resemblance because of resemblance of genes of different human races
giving
rise to same type of feelings and understandings in them.
Not
only tongue,
but also every sense organ follows feelings of the brain and the brain’s
feelings follow the senses of the sense organs. As humans have same
genes,
their brains act in the same way and their sense organs act in a similar
way
whether knowingly or unknowingly, leading to similarity in languages,
cultures
and habits.
If
all the
languages had the same mother language, then either many of its words
should
preserve their signature of both spelling and accentuation equally in
almost
all of the now existing languages or many of them should lose their
signature
equally in many of the present languages. But, what actually the
situation is,
a very few words have the same signature of spelling and accentuation in
many
of the current languages and most of the remaining words referring to
similar objects
have no similarities in spelling, but have similarities to some extent
in
accentuation (accentuation is more similar than the spellings, between
different languages) of the words referring to similar objects. If
spellings of
the words have changed, then their accentuation also should have changed
with
time. So, the actual situation contradicts with the theory that there
was a single
source mother language for all of the present languages. Yet, there
could not
be any mature language in speech before human-beings started spreading
through
out the world before civilization, to give similarities in the languages
of
different regions. So, there was not a single mother language for all of
the
present languages. All languages took birth independently in different
regions
of the world. But, regional languages could have got inheritance from
some
regional mother language, like Indian languages from Sanskrit.
